kif.rocks ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.

Serverstatistik:

161
aktive Profile

#incentive

0 Beiträge0 Beteiligte0 Beiträge heute
Antwortete im Thread

@vampiress yeah...

For the most part #Microsoft refused to adapt to the market and unlike #Sony didn't really get that well along with local #Developers (Studios like #cave are an exception from the norm!), so there isn't much #incentive to make #Games for the #XboxSeries, #XboxOne and even before that #Xbox360 & OG #Xbox / #XboxClassic...

That's why there's a production plant for Xboxes since the 360 Slim in Brazil where the #PS3 launched at a whopping $4k (exchange rate, not local purchasing power adjusted!!!) price tag due to extreme #tariffs being put on #imported #electronics.

New study: In the field of cardiology, most researchers who practice #OpenScience learned it on the job without #training.
openheart.bmj.com/content/11/1

"More than half…indicated they would benefit from practical support from their institution on how to perform open science practices…Participants indicated that #funding was the most essential #incentive to adopt open science."

#Universities
@openscience

Open Heart · Cardiology researchers’ practices and perceived barriers to open science: an international surveyObjective Open science is a movement and set of practices to conduct research more transparently. Implementing open science will significantly improve public access and supports equity. It also has the potential to foster innovation and reduce duplication through data and materials sharing. Here, we survey an international group of researchers publishing in cardiovascular journals regarding their perceptions and practices related to open science. Methods We identified the top 100 ‘Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine’ subject category journals from the SCImago journal ranking platform. This is a publicly available portal that draws from Scopus. We then extracted the corresponding author’s name and email from all articles published in these journals between 1 March 2021 and 1 March 2022. Participants were sent a purpose-built survey about open science. The survey contained primarily multiple choice and scale-based questions for which we report count data and percentages. For the few text-based responses we conducted thematic content analysis. Results 198 participants responded to our survey. Participants had a mean response of 6.8 (N=197, SD=1.8) on a 9-point scale with endpoints, not at all familiar (1) and extremely familiar (9), when indicating how familiar they were with open science. When asked about where they obtained open science training, most participants indicated this was done on the job self-initiated while conducting research (n=103, 52%), or that they had no formal training with respect to open science (n=72, 36%). More than half of the participants indicated they would benefit from practical support from their institution on how to perform open science practices (N=106, 54%). A diversity of barriers to each of the open science practices presented to participants were acknowledged. Participants indicated that funding was the most essential incentive to adopt open science. Conclusions It is clear that policy alone will not lead to the effective implementation of open science. This survey serves as a baseline for the cardiovascular research community’s open science performance and perception and can be used to inform future interventions and monitoring. Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data is openly available here: <https://osf.io/v42u8/>.

"#Open #software underpins most research today…The accuracy and reproducibility of scientific results is increasingly dependent on updating and maintaining software. However, the #incentive structure in #academia for software development — and especially maintenance — is insufficient. It is time that appropriate incentives are embraced to reflect their importance."
nature.com/articles/s41559-023
(#paywalled)

#OpenSource
@academicchatter

NatureBetter incentives are needed to reward academic software development - Nature Ecology & Evolution
Antwortete im Thread

@leonid
I might add:
In our #transformation work with client organizations, they turn their structures outside-in, eliminate their #incentive systems and their stance on #careers. All that and more within just 90 days, with #OpenSpaceBeta:
redforty2.com/openspace-beta

To change structure
and to #decentralize, they adopt the #CellStructureDesign approach: redforty2.com/cellstructuredes
It pretty much changes everything we think and believe about structure. While strengthening #ValueCreation immediately.

Red42: Promoting organizational decentralization & transformationOpenSpace Beta: Change & transformation, unleashedThe 1st Work the System approach from Red42. The reinvention of change
Antwortete im Thread

Things I've been absolutely fascinated with: #governance and #governancestructures, #socialnetworks, #gametheory, #incentive systems and mechanism / #gamedesign, #decentralized anything, organizational #rituals, #advertising theory, #information #networks, #psychology, #sociobiology, #complexsystems theory, #emergence, #swarmcognition, #groupformation and #autopoiesis, risk reward processing, and the nature of #homeostasis in living systems.

Basically I wanna put sentient robotic ants on mars.